TO ILLUSTRATE SET THEORY, WE DID AN IN'CLASS EXERCISE. STUDENTS HAD TO DECIDE WHICH SIDE OF THE ROOM TO STAND ON. BASED ON WHICH OF EACH PAIR THEY PREFERRED.
- Target or Wal-Mart
- ==
- slave or free
- Jew or Gentile
- extrovert or introvert
- Lenno or McCartney
- rock or country
- FUNERAL OR WEDDING?
TOPICS COVERED WEEK 1
- Introductions
- Name
- Tell me about yourself
- work
- Musical group or singer
- ,
- Exercise:Set theory
- Final exam prep: Philemon
- Texts and World
- Genesis 1 and 2
- EVERYTHING IS SPIRITUAL
- =
Jesus was Asian!
What continent is Israel on?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If you have not yet taken BIB 314, save your answers, as you may have this exact assignment again. If you have already taken it, you may paste in your answers from that class (Note: this will be the case for a few other assignments later). i)List at least two examples of chiasm used in the class and/or video ii)List at least two examples of chiasm you find online, create, or know of (that were not used in class/video). iii)Talk about chiasm. Is this a new idea/term for you? Interesting? Why or why not? How might catching chiasm help you in reading the Bible, or any text?
I look forward this class..I think you'll' enjoy it, too..
...I did when I took it in 1983>>
---
STRATEGY:
BIB 314 asks, "Who is Jesus?"
and "What is Church?"
This class asks
- "1)How do I read a text of Scripture via a Three Worlds approach?"
- 2)"What does Scripture have to say about community?
- 3)What does Scripture have to say about my major?
Literary World--The literary world of the Bible is simply the text itself, apart from anything outside the text. We mean the world (or, better, worlds) created by the text; the words on the page, by the stories, songs, letters and the myriad other types of literature that make up the Bible. All good literature (and the Bible is, among other things, good literature) creates in readers' minds magnificent, mysterious, and often moving worlds that take on a reality of their own, whether or not they represent anything real outside the pages (Hauer and Young ch 2).
Historical World--The historical world of the Bible isthe world "behind the text" or "outside the text". It is the context in which the Bible came to be written, translated, and interpreted over time, until the present. In studying the historical world of the Bible, we look for evidence outside the text that helps us answer questions such as, who wrote this text, when was it written, to whom was it written, and why was it written. We also probe the text itself for evidence that links it to historical times, places, situations, and persons (Hauer and Young 2)..
Contemporary World--The contemporary world is the "world in front of the text" or the "world of the reader." In one sense, there are as many contemporary worlds of the Bible as there are readers, for each of us brings our own particular concerns and questions to the text. They inevitably shape our reading experience. We are all interested in answering the questions of whether the Bible in general, or particular texts, have any relevance to our personal lives
--
"Final Exam" prep/Philemon: First read.
What do you remember from our discussion?
-FOR YOUR PAPER, Be sure to include: Evidence from the text re: whether the slavery (of Onesimus) and brotherhood of Philemon and Onesimus are literal, metaphorical, or both. Evidence from the text re: whether Onesimus ran away.
-CHALLENGE: MEMORIZE PHILEMON in our class translation by Week 6.
your notes:
Texts:
TEXTS
TEXT: the word does not mean just written words, or text message..
a TEXT is technically ":any message in any medium, designed to communicate anything"
so obviously the Bible counts as a TEXT message.
.
But so does everything.
All you ever do is send and receive and interpret texts:
Every conversation, film, book is a text.
Students: send me a random text message (see my phone number on syllabus), It can be anything; you don't even have to identify yourself. I will read some of these in class for fun...and to show that texts need context
Because several of the classes I teach have to do with how to read and interpret texts (particularly biblical texts) , contexts, and intertextuality...I actually encourage students to send me text messages in class.
They often look at me as if I am kidding, even afraid I will confiscate their phone if they do.
...Or worse! Check out this shocking video , revealing one professor's policy on texting :in class:
Here's one teacher who welcomes texting in class:
DID YOU TEXT ME YET? I'M SERIOUS>>DO IT NOW
One church's policy on cell phones (video below)
FPU professor (and Textpert) Greg Camp introduced me to thebrilliant idea of having students text me in class.
I ask them to send me a random text message (anything) or to forward me a text message from their inbox. These become our curriculum for the next few minutes as we interpret them.
This opens great discussion..
And very often I get a text that says, "The university president just emailed, notifying that all classes get out early today."
(:
Suffice to say the whole idea of texting in class has proven to be a fruitful means of discussing the only thing we ever engage in, and the only job we have:
interpreting text messages.
Huh?
Increasingly, the definition of text is becoming:
"any message, in any medium, intended to communicate anything"
Movies are texts; conversations at St. Arbuck's are texts. etc
So the primary discipline/skill/art we should cultivate is that of sending and interpreting text messages.
All of life is a text message.
Of course, when dealing with The Text (Scripture), how much more...
Text, subtext, and context is everything.
Text me..
Thanks for texting me in class.
What do you remember about the BUTT CHEEKS (BUT CHEEKS) story?
texts need contexts.
Professor Ernest Brennecke of Columbia is credited with inventing a sentence that can be made to have eight different meanings by placing ONE WORD in all possible positions in the sentence:
"I hit him in the eye yesterday."
The word is "ONLY".
The Message:
1.ONLY I hit him in the eye yesterday. (No one else did.)
2.I ONLY hit him in the eye yesterday. (Did not slap him.)
3.I hit ONLY him in the eye yesterday. (I did not hit others.)
4.I hit him ONLY in the eye yesterday. (I did not hit outside the eye.)
5.I hit him in ONLY the eye yesterday. (Not other organs.)
6.I hit him in the ONLY eye yesterday. (He doesn't have another eye..)
7.I hit him in the eye ONLY yesterday. (Not today.)
8.I hit him in the eye yesterday ONLY. (Did not wait for today.)
context is everything.]
T the two stories of creation: Gen 1:1 – 2:3 and Gen. 2:4-25).
with the two stories of creation:
the two stories of creation: Gen 1:1 – 2:3 and Gen. 2:4-25).
what do you remember about your observations?
The two accounts are separate but complementary, like the four gospels. They can be read at different levels, from literal to figurative, with no bearing on the truth of it. Poetry is not less true than a newspaper, just a different kind or mode of truth. And, one must always ask the question what the implied author intended and what the implied audience would have understood. Ancient notions of history are very different from ours.Genesis 1:repetitious, tabular, formaldays of creation reported in the same way, formulaicauthority and brevitystyle of ordering material into a series of similar solemn commands are unchallengedcontent presents major divisions of creation known to writercatalog or tabulation of events and commandsvocabulary = create (bara), humanity as likeness/image, male/fernaleGod = Elohim, characterized as powerful cosmic organizer, speaks things into being, stands outside of cosmos and controls itHumanity = created as vice regent, created in image gives representative statuspolemic against mythical concepts of life and creationGenesis 2:relationship of characters emphasizedlanguage is picturesque and flowing, poetic terms, colorfulGod's actions more interrelated than separated by divisions of time or set expressions (idioms)no two acts are alike and none are preceded by divine commandvocabulary = form (yasar), humanity as living being, man/womanGod = Yahweh, characterized by immanence, personal nearness, involvement on human scene, intimate master, depicted humanly (hands, walking, digging)Humanity = ready contact with and immediate responsibility to God. Humanity's creation linked to ground (word play on adam = man and adamah = ground) and curse is alienation from the land, is distinctive because Yahweh personally addresses himpolemic against fertility cults in Canaan
Compare Genesis accounts to Babylonian Creation story (read an excerpt here). Significant similarities – Genesis is not written in a vacuum. Significant differences – lack of violence, struggle, multiple gods, etc.Enuma Elish:a. creation by word - Marduk has this power. They tell him to open his mouth. At the word of his mouth XXX vanishes or reappears.b. command over elements - Marduk enlists wind and storm to defeat Tiamat, but battles with elements too.c. Tiamat is split in two and body is used to retain waters and set firmament and ground.d. sets stars in their place, gives moon and sun jurisdiction, setting dayse. creation of man - "blood I will make and bones I will cause to be" new idea like Genesis but he creates out of a dead god's body and for the purpose of "the relief of the gods".In Genesis, we see a carefully structured account, bringing order out of chaos. The sea and darkness are elements of chaos in the ancient world. No work can be done in the dark; salt water kills agriculture; unknown depths and sea creatures are in the sea. God has ability to control and limit these. Chaos is not eliminated or bounded. God creates out of nothing (vs. other creation myths of the day), and the verb used for "create" (bara) is something no human ever does in the Old Testament. Only God does this action. There are also no elements of struggle or battle to create, which is typical of other contemporary creation myths. God simply speaks or shapes things into being. There are also no birthing images, which are common in other myths, and quickly lead to a confusion between Creator and creature (vs. God as wholly other), and to fertility cults. Also, most other creation myths were a people’s story (how the Mesopotamians came to be, for instance). Genesis is not presented as Israel’s story, but as the story of the world. ( to really appreciate the beauty and brilliance of these chapters, one has to read Hebrew. These verses are packed with wordplays and puns. It may not immediately occur to one that puns are a good form of theological education, but,,,
.3a) Genesis 1-2 followup: Everything is Spiritual (by Fri pm, respond to 1 student by Sun pm)
.
Movie Night #1 (with popcorn): "Everything is Spiritual"
Post by Fri pm, and reply to two others by Sun pm.
-----------------------------------------------------
You may come to love "Movie Night" in this class. We will have a film/video here every week.
Highly recommended you watch with someone else (family, friend, class mate). Large screen and popcorn may help.
Challenge kids or loved ones to watch, and even help with your homework questions on it
Sorry to say that this week's film will be the longest of the entire class by far. BUT I am almost positive you will enjoy it.
This week the movie is at this link, or here below: "Everything is Spiritual" by Rob Bell. Consider it the key "lecture" of the week, yet without the pressure to take detailed notes, just take it in and post on the questions below, Many students find this a memorable, and many even a life-changing video. Be open. (Do NOT worry about detail .DON'T stress or even try to get all the content: impossible).
It is (among other things) a complement and follow-up to our discussion on the Three Worlds of the two creation accounts in Genesis Notice the speaker also talks about an alternative ancient creation account. It is the Babylonian account in your syllabus and reading for Week 1.
--
Questions:
part a: BEFORE WATCHING VIDEO, Take a look at the picture posted here of the "Everything is Spiritual" video's "outline" (if you don't see any picture, or want to enlarge picture, click this). In your mind, does it make any sense? What is the first word or phrase you said/thought when you saw it? What might you guess any of this might mean? Any clues as to the content? Post your answer below.
Part b:
AFTER answering part a, Watch the "Everything is Spiritual" video below ( Remember: Do NOT worry about detail .DON'T stress or even try to get all the content: impossible).
Post a few paragraphs which:
--convinces the teacher you watched the whole thing (and didn't copy another student's post)
-- are a significant summary and/or response and/or review (300 words min)
-Include at some point:
-comment on what you see as the thesis or the big idea (put the big idea/thesis in a phrase or a sentence) and 2 or 3 of your favorite parts.
-Comments on the benefits/drawbacks of an "outline" of a presentation that consists of signs (pictures, images and whiteboard markings)-- like the one posted above the video.
- IMPORTANT: how did the other "other" creation account he mentioned (it is the Babylonian account in your syllabus and forum reading for Week 1) compare/relate to the biblical account in Genesis ? Fill in the blank with a word or phrase:
"Maybe the biblical account of creation is meant to __________ the other creation accounts."
If you listen carefully when he starts talking about the "other" account, this should be easy. BUT beware, most students get this wrong (even giving an answer opposite the correct one). Update: You won't be graded off if your answer is wrong. So give your best answer, and don't look at other answers until you post. We will tally and discuss answers next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment