by FPU faculty Camp/Roberts
Purpose/
objectives:
This section focuses on making a connection between the events leading up to
Jesus’ death and his death itself. Students should see the way in which
conflicts and tensions (especially related to his identity and authority)
present throughout Jesus’ public ministry escalate in the last week and lead
ultimately to his death.
Relevant
reading: Matthew,
Kraybill, H & Y ch 11 (section on “Son of Man” title)
Students
were asked to read all of Matthew’s gospel in prep for last week. Thiss session consists of brief overview of the events that lead up
to Jesus’ death, and an activity that works at making a connection between
these events and his death. There is a clear connection between this escalating
tension with the religious authorities, which ends in Jesus’ execution, and the
tension evident during his public ministry.
Lecture/Discussion
Jesus
ministry creates a crisis, challenging assumptions and standards of his
day. It is important to keep in mind
that the Pharisees are very concerned with what that standard is, and trying
very hard to live it out in their own lives. In fact, they are the standard,
and are seen as such by the people. They
are respected and looked up to. Ask the
class to consider who those people are that they respect or admire
spiritually. Who is it that they
consider saintly or holy people? That’s
prevailing attitude toward the Pharisees in Jesus’ day.
As
we try to understand the last week of Jesus’ life, it is worth looking at some
of the teaching and conflicts in Jesus’ ministry that lead to the last week.
Matthew makes very clear this connection between Jesus’ ministry and his death.
(The conflicts in Matthew seem to be of several natures: Sabbath, purity,
Scripture, loyalties and Jesus’ identity.) What is the connection between the
life of Jesus and the death of Jesus? To answer this we will study passages
that talk about Jesus’ conflict with the religious leaders.
Activity
Students should read and briefly describe the issue(s) at the core of the
conflict in their assigned passage (see below).
Part
of what surfaces is that the two greatest commandments, love of God and love of
others, are interdependent. One cannot
claim to love God, while neglecting or at the expense of loving others. In these passages, we see the authorities
trying to pull these two priorities apart, and Jesus reorienting them back
together.
9:2-8 authority to forgive sin; Jesus’
identity; blasphemy (speaking & taking authority that is not yours)
9:10-13 purity issues
12:1-8 Sabbath; interpretation of
Scripture
12:10-13 cannot separate love of God & love
of others
15:2-9 purity issues vs. bigger
commandments
19:4-9 trying to find loophole in law
22:16-22 God
vs. Caesar (if we’re made in God’s image, what then is given to God? We are!)
22:24-33 authorities
don’t understand Scripture and don’t understand God
22:36-40 priority
of law: love of God & love of others not separate realities
What are
some of the things being pulled apart?
1) Sabbath devotion
to God does not allow neglect of others
2) Purity can’t
keep separate from people who don’t follow God
3) Scripture don’t
allow Scripture (i.e., bad interpretation of) to be a crutch for sin
4) Loyalties government/God;
family/God
Jesus’
identity and authority (especially by what authority he does or says things)
should surface and resurface as issues.
Revisit:
What seems to be meant by Son of Man? What does the term mean? We initially
think affirmation of humanity. But this has a complex use in Scripture. Jesus
calls himself this only. What image is he drawing on? Three contexts in the
Hebrew Bible
1) Address to prophet Ezekiel
2) Emphasizes frailty of humanity vs. permanence
of God, also emphasizes human participation in God’s creative act (Numbers,
Psalms)
3) Eschatological figure in Daniel 7, whose
coming signals the end of history and the coming of divine judgment (what does
Jesus say when he is before the Sanhedrin?! They would clearly understand this
as image of judgment, of Coming One of God)
We
know that Jesus comes to die in fulfillment of Scripture, but we can also see
reasons humanly speaking that would lead to his death. His life and ministry
are connected to his death. They lead to it. From the standpoint of the
opposition, it is because of what he is saying and doing that Jesus must be
killed.
No comments:
Post a Comment